|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
22/02/2021 |
Actualizado : |
22/02/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
CABRERA, D.; RODRIGUEZ, P.; UBERTI, A.; ZOPPOLO, R. |
Afiliación : |
CARLOS DANILO CABRERA BOLOGNA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO ANDRES RODRIGUEZ BRUNO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. UBERTI, Federal University of Fronteira Sul - UFFS, Chapeco?, Brazil.; ROBERTO JOSE ZOPPOLO GOLDSCHMIDT, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Productive behavior of 'Williams' pear (Pyrus communis L.) grafted onto different rootstocks. [Conference paper]. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Acta Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 145-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22 |
ISSN : |
0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic) |
DOI : |
10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein. |
Contenido : |
Abstract:
The most widely used rootstocks for pears are of the genus Pyrus and Cydonia. The objective of this study was to evaluate yield and fruit quality of 'Williams' pear trees on different rootstocks. The experiment was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria INIA Las Brujas, Uruguay. 'Williams' trees were planted in 2003 and evaluated during four consecutive growing seasons starting in 2014/15. Rootstocks were 'OH×F40' and 'OH×F69' (Pyrus communis), 'BA29', 'EMC', and 'Adams' quince (Cydonia oblonga). For quinces, 'Beurre Hardy' (Pyrus communis) was used as an interstem. Spacing was 4.5 m between rows, varying the space between plants, according to the expected vigor of each rootstock. For 'OH×F40', 'OH×F69' and 'BA29' plants were spaced 1.70 m (1,307 trees ha‑1), 'Adams' 1.50 m (1,481 trees ha‑1), and 'EMC' 1.30 m (1,709 trees ha‑1). The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments (rootstocks), and four replications. Fruit diameter, average fruit weight, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, number of fruits, and yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test and, when significant, the means were compared through Tukey?s test at 5%. In the 2015/16 and 2017/18 growing seasons there was low production mainly due to insufficient accumulation of chilling during the winter of 2015 and 2017, respectively. Fruit diameter and soluble solids content did not present differences among the tested rootstocks. 'BA29' induced higher fruit weight in comparison to 'OH×F69' and a firmer fruit compared to 'OH×F69' and 'OH×F40', in the 2016/17 growing season. For productivity, it was observed that 'OH×F40' was superior in the 2014/15 growing season, while in the 2016/17 growing season all Pyrus rootstocks were substantially superior. Results showed that Pyrus rootstocks had better performance compared to quince under optimal conditions but were less robust when climatic conditions (chill units and precipitation) were not good for pear cultivation.
@ International Society for Horticultural Science. MenosAbstract:
The most widely used rootstocks for pears are of the genus Pyrus and Cydonia. The objective of this study was to evaluate yield and fruit quality of 'Williams' pear trees on different rootstocks. The experiment was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria INIA Las Brujas, Uruguay. 'Williams' trees were planted in 2003 and evaluated during four consecutive growing seasons starting in 2014/15. Rootstocks were 'OH×F40' and 'OH×F69' (Pyrus communis), 'BA29', 'EMC', and 'Adams' quince (Cydonia oblonga). For quinces, 'Beurre Hardy' (Pyrus communis) was used as an interstem. Spacing was 4.5 m between rows, varying the space between plants, according to the expected vigor of each rootstock. For 'OH×F40', 'OH×F69' and 'BA29' plants were spaced 1.70 m (1,307 trees ha‑1), 'Adams' 1.50 m (1,481 trees ha‑1), and 'EMC' 1.30 m (1,709 trees ha‑1). The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments (rootstocks), and four replications. Fruit diameter, average fruit weight, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, number of fruits, and yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test and, when significant, the means were compared through Tukey?s test at 5%. In the 2015/16 and 2017/18 growing seasons there was low production mainly due to insufficient accumulation of chilling during the winter of 2015 and 2017, respectively. Fruit diameter and soluble solids content did not present difference... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
CLIMATIC CONDITIONS; FRUTICULTURE; Interstem; QUINCE; URUGUAY. |
Thesagro : |
MEMBRILLO. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
Marc : |
LEADER 03214naa a2200265 a 4500 001 1061741 005 2021-02-22 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic) 024 7 $a10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22$2DOI 100 1 $aCABRERA, D. 245 $aProductive behavior of 'Williams' pear (Pyrus communis L.) grafted onto different rootstocks. [Conference paper].$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein. 520 $aAbstract: The most widely used rootstocks for pears are of the genus Pyrus and Cydonia. The objective of this study was to evaluate yield and fruit quality of 'Williams' pear trees on different rootstocks. The experiment was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria INIA Las Brujas, Uruguay. 'Williams' trees were planted in 2003 and evaluated during four consecutive growing seasons starting in 2014/15. Rootstocks were 'OH×F40' and 'OH×F69' (Pyrus communis), 'BA29', 'EMC', and 'Adams' quince (Cydonia oblonga). For quinces, 'Beurre Hardy' (Pyrus communis) was used as an interstem. Spacing was 4.5 m between rows, varying the space between plants, according to the expected vigor of each rootstock. For 'OH×F40', 'OH×F69' and 'BA29' plants were spaced 1.70 m (1,307 trees ha‑1), 'Adams' 1.50 m (1,481 trees ha‑1), and 'EMC' 1.30 m (1,709 trees ha‑1). The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments (rootstocks), and four replications. Fruit diameter, average fruit weight, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, number of fruits, and yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test and, when significant, the means were compared through Tukey?s test at 5%. In the 2015/16 and 2017/18 growing seasons there was low production mainly due to insufficient accumulation of chilling during the winter of 2015 and 2017, respectively. Fruit diameter and soluble solids content did not present differences among the tested rootstocks. 'BA29' induced higher fruit weight in comparison to 'OH×F69' and a firmer fruit compared to 'OH×F69' and 'OH×F40', in the 2016/17 growing season. For productivity, it was observed that 'OH×F40' was superior in the 2014/15 growing season, while in the 2016/17 growing season all Pyrus rootstocks were substantially superior. Results showed that Pyrus rootstocks had better performance compared to quince under optimal conditions but were less robust when climatic conditions (chill units and precipitation) were not good for pear cultivation. @ International Society for Horticultural Science. 650 $aMEMBRILLO 653 $aCLIMATIC CONDITIONS 653 $aFRUTICULTURE 653 $aInterstem 653 $aQUINCE 653 $aURUGUAY 700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ, P. 700 1 $aUBERTI, A. 700 1 $aZOPPOLO, R. 773 $tActa Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 145-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
21/12/2020 |
Actualizado : |
22/12/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Autor : |
INIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA); INIA TACUAREMBÓ |
Afiliación : |
ESTACIÓN EXPERIMENTAL DEL NORTE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
PASTURAS 2021: recomendaciones INIA. Ciclo Destacadas INIA 2020. |
Complemento del título : |
Actividades. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista INIA Uruguay, 2020, no.63, p.84. |
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 63). |
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
El objetivo de estas jornadas del ciclo de Destacadas INIA 2020 fue poner el foco en la importancia de planificar con suficiente anticipación la implantación de nuestros recursos forrajeros para el próximo otoño.
ACCEDA a las presentaciones:
1.- Pasturas 2021: foco en genética - http://www.inia.uy/estaciones-experimentales/direcciones-regionales/inia-tacuarembó/Pasturas-2021-recomendaciones-INIA---foco-en-genetica
2.- Pasturas 2021: foco en manejo - http://www.inia.uy/estaciones-experimentales/direcciones-regionales/inia-tacuarembó/Pasturas-2021-recomendaciones-INIA---foco-en-manejo |
Palabras claves : |
DESTACADAS INIA 2020. |
Thesagro : |
PASTURAS. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/14906/1/Revista-INIA-63-Diciembre-2020-p-84.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01147naa a2200181 a 4500 001 1061623 005 2020-12-22 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1510-9011 100 1 $aINIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA) 245 $aPASTURAS 2021$brecomendaciones INIA. Ciclo Destacadas INIA 2020.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 490 $a(Revista INIA; 63). 520 $aEl objetivo de estas jornadas del ciclo de Destacadas INIA 2020 fue poner el foco en la importancia de planificar con suficiente anticipación la implantación de nuestros recursos forrajeros para el próximo otoño. ACCEDA a las presentaciones: 1.- Pasturas 2021: foco en genética - http://www.inia.uy/estaciones-experimentales/direcciones-regionales/inia-tacuarembó/Pasturas-2021-recomendaciones-INIA---foco-en-genetica 2.- Pasturas 2021: foco en manejo - http://www.inia.uy/estaciones-experimentales/direcciones-regionales/inia-tacuarembó/Pasturas-2021-recomendaciones-INIA---foco-en-manejo 650 $aPASTURAS 653 $aDESTACADAS INIA 2020 700 1 $aINIA TACUAREMBÓ 773 $tRevista INIA Uruguay, 2020, no.63, p.84.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|